In June, 8.7% more homes were sold than in May. It’s the fifth straight month of increases — a 17.9% increase over June 2008.

“This rebound reflects the releasing of a pent-up demand by buyers who moved to the sidelines towards the end of last year,” said CREA chief economist Gregory Klump.

“Now there are signs the worst of the recession may be behind us, those people are emerging.”

The bounce back was strongest in British Columbia, where 39.8% more homes were sold in June this over the same month last year. According to the CREA report, Ontario was up 15.7%, Quebec 9.8%, Alberta 22.2%, Saskatchewan 25.2% and Manitoba 0.2%.

This surge in home buying came despite a decision by Canada’s five big banks last month to raise five-year fixed mortgage rates 40 basis points from 5.45% to 5.85%.

The decision was made despite the Bank of Canada’s efforts to keep borrowing low by pledging to hold interest rates at the historic low of 0.25% until the middle of 2010.

Mary Webb, a senior economist with Scotiabank, says the low long-term interest rates in the spring were a reflection of a global economy with almost no signs of growth and that was bound to change.

“Now we’re looking for a recovery, and not just in Canada but globally, and we’re seeing it already in China and we expect growth to strengthen later this year and early next,” Webb said.

With more people borrowing, banks are being forced to pay more to borrow the money they lend to home buyers, and that drives up long-term interest rates, she said.

http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/07/15/10136046-sun.html

brought by Alexander Moishe, Canadian Funding Corp CEO

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts07162009.html

There is no economy left to recover. The U.S. manufacturing economy was lost to offshoring and free trade ideology. It was replaced by a mythical “New Economy.”

The “New Economy” was based on services. Its artificial life was fed by the Federal Reserve’s artificially low interest rates, which produced a real estate bubble, and by “free market” financial deregulation, which unleashed financial gangsters to new heights of debt leverage and fraudulent financial products.

The real economy was traded away for a make-believe economy. When the make-believe economy collapsed, Americans’ wealth in their real estate, pensions, and savings collapsed dramatically while their jobs disappeared.

The debt economy caused Americans to leverage their assets. They refinanced their homes and spent the equity. They maxed out numerous credit cards. They worked as many jobs as they could find. Debt expansion and multiple family incomes kept the economy going.

And now suddenly Americans can’t borrow in order to spend. They are over their heads in debt. Jobs are disappearing. America’s consumer economy, approximately 70 percent of GDP, is dead. Those Americans who still have jobs are saving against the prospect of job loss. Millions are homeless. Some have moved in with family and friends; others are living in tent cities.

Meanwhile the U.S. government’s budget deficit has jumped from $455 billion in 2008 to $2,000 billion this year, with another $2,000 billion on the books for 2010. And President Obama has intensified America’s expensive war of aggression in Afghanistan and initiated a new war in Pakistan.

There is no way for these deficits to be financed except by printing money or by further collapse in stock markets that would drive people out of equity into bonds.

The US government’s budget is 50 percent in the red. That means half of every dollar the federal government spends must be borrowed or printed. Because of the worldwide debacle caused by Wall Street’s financial gangsterism, the world needs its own money and hasn’t $2 trillion annually to lend to Washington.

As dollars are printed, the growing supply adds to the pressure on the dollar’s role as reserve currency. Already America’s largest creditor, China, is admonishing Washington to protect China’s investment in U.S. debt and lobbying for a new reserve currency to replace the dollar before it collapses. According to various reports, China is spending down its holdings of U.S. dollars by acquiring gold and stocks of raw materials and energy.

The price of 1-ounce gold coins is $1,000 despite efforts of the U.S. government to hold down the gold price. How high will this price jump when the rest of the world decides that the bankruptcy of “the world’s only superpower” is at hand?

And what will happen to America’s ability to import not only oil but also the manufactured goods on which it is import-dependent?

When the oversupplied U.S. dollar loses the reserve currency role, the U.S. will no longer be able to pay for its massive imports of real goods and services with pieces of paper. Overnight, shortages will appear and Americans will be poorer.

Nothing in Presidents Bush and Obama’s economic policy addresses the real issues. Instead, Goldman Sachs was bailed out, more than once. As Eliot Spitzer said, the banks made a “bloody fortune” with U.S. aid.

It was not the millions of now homeless homeowners who were bailed out. It was not the scant remains of American manufacturing — General Motors and Chrysler — that were bailed out. It was the Wall Street banks.

According to Bloomberg.com, Goldman Sachs’ current record earnings from their free or low-cost capital supplied by broke American taxpayers has led the firm to decide to boost compensation and benefits by 33 percent. On an annual basis, this comes to compensation of $773,000 per employee.

This should tell even the most dimwitted patriot whom “their” government represents.

The worst of the economic crisis has not yet hit. I don’t mean the rest of the real estate crisis that is waiting in the wings. Home prices will fall further when the foreclosed properties currently held off the market are dumped. Store and office closings are diminishing the ability of owners of shopping malls and office buildings to make their mortgage payments. Commercial real estate loans were also securitized and turned into derivatives.

The real crisis awaits us. It is the crisis of high unemployment, of stagnant and declining real wages confronted with rising prices from the printing of money to pay the government’s bills and from the dollar’s loss of exchange value. Suddenly Wal-Mart prices will look like Nieman Marcus prices.

Retirees dependent on state pension systems, which cannot print money, might not be paid, or might be paid with IOUs. They will not even have depreciating money with which to try to pay their bills. Desperate tax authorities will squeeze the remaining life out of the middle class.

Nothing in Obama’s economic policy is directed at saving the U.S. dollar as reserve currency or the livelihoods of the American people. Obama’s policy, like Bush’s before him, is keyed to the enrichment of Goldman Sachs and the armament industries.

Matt Taibbi describes Goldman Sachs as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.” Look at the Goldman Sachs representatives in the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations. This bankster firm controls the economic policy of the United States.

Little wonder that Goldman Sachs has record earnings while the rest of us grow poorer by the day.

—-

http://gata.org/node/7601

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC Canadian Funding Corp CEO

Sales rose 8.7 percent to 41,304 homes from the previous month on a seasonally adjusted basis, the Canadian Real Estate Association said today in a statement from Ottawa. Average home prices rose 3.6 percent from a year earlier and the inventory of unsold homes fell to its lowest since August 2007.

Recent data on Canada’s housing market suggest the Bank of Canada’s efforts to stimulate spending with interest rate cuts are helping fuel demand for homes and may be reversing a slump in home construction. The Bank of Canada, which forecast that housing will shed 1.1 percentage points from growth in 2009, has cut its benchmark lending rate to a record 0.25 percent.

“Obviously there is one segment of society that doesn’t believe this will be a lengthy downturn,” said Doug Porter, deputy chief economist with BMO Capital Markets in Toronto.

New home sales jumped a record 32 percent during the second quarter to 114,173 units, the realtor group said. The number of months needed to sell current inventories fell to 4.2 in June, the lowest level in more than two years.

Agents and Brokers

Output of real estate agents and brokers was up 8.2 percent in April, Statistics Canada said June 30. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. said July 9 that new home construction rose for a second month in June, while the total value of permits issued by municipalities jumped 15 percent in May.

One explanation for the pick-up in the real estate market, Porter said, may be that the decline earlier this year was “extreme” and created pent-up demand for homes. Existing home sales fell in January to their lowest since 2000.

“I can’t help but wonder whether these gains are sustainable,” Porter said.

The country also may be benefiting from a financial system that has largely escaped bad-asset problems plaguing other countries.

“The positive impact of low interest rates on mortgage demand is clearly much more powerful in Canada than in the U.S.,” Derek Holt, an economist at Scotia Capital in Toronto, said in a note to investors.

http://montrealhypotheque.blogspot.com/2009/07/june-home-sales-rise-87.html

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC Canadian Funding Corp CEO

OmniTRAX president and real estate developer, Patrick Broe …

A real estate developer?

Others undoubtedly saw that line and took in its full meaning. But I had focused on Broe as president of a U.S. railway company, OmniTRAX, who was bidding for BCRail. And who, rumour says, was offered a substantial consolation prize for losing out. Or being pushed out. Or something.

OmniTRAX had trains in the U.S., but had only just begun its quest for a Canadian empire. OmniTRAX had obtained ownership of Hudson Bay Railway and the Port of Churchill. What a deal that was, with the Arctic Ocean opening up because of global warming. Today is July 14, 2009 and today I think Pat Broe is a real estate developer who knows more than we do about how railways lead to real estate.

News item in BUSINESS WIRE for March 15, 2004: Broe begins land division with initial operations focused on Intermodal, Rail Related … Read about it HERE.

So OmniTRAX president, Pat Broe, is a major real estate developer. Early in 2002, he was meeting with, and corresponding with Gordon Campbell and promoting OmniTRAX as an attractive partner in Gordo’s vision for B.C. prosperity.

Broe, as OmniTRAX, already owned a small railway in the Okanagan, plus Hudson Bay Railway and the Port of Churchill. HBRY is 810 miles of former CN track, from The Pas to Churchill, Canada’s only Arctic seaport [www.portofchurchill.ca] Broe’s OmniTRAX took possession of the whole shebang, port and rail line, by paying $10. to the Canadian federal government in September 1997. Ten bucks.

Gordon Campbell, the Vancouver real estate developer, formed the BC government in 2001 and immediately began talking about selling BCRail. Pat Broe must have zeroed in very quickly.

Then Erik Bornman enters the scene by registering with Gordo’s B.C. government as a consultant lobbyist representing the Broe Companies. Bornman busies himself looking for B.C. investment opportunities in economic development and trade, such as rail transportation.

Soon Pat Broe, Dwight Johnson are having dinner with the B.C. Minister of Finance, Gary Collins. For some reason, police wanted to know what those men were discussing. There were RCMP inside the Villa del Lupa restaurant as well as outside, making videos of that meeting. Thank goodness.

Today is July 14, 2009 when various spectacular BC Rail properties can be scooped by CN for $1. Or so we hear.

I think that maybe Collins, Broe, and Johnson were talking, in a roundabout way, about land, lots and lotsa land to be had for 1/10th the cost of the Hudson Bay Railway plus Port of Churchill.

Pat Broe is a real estate developer.

- BC Mary.

“”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”

lynx has left a new comment on your post “Give me land, lots of land, under starry skies above …”:

In light of what BC Mary has just written – here is an excerpt from hansard between Joy MacPhail and Gary Collins: (Read between the lines and think real estate deal and it reads a whole new way.)

J. MacPhail (Leader of the Opposition): I have two concluding questions. These are a follow-up from my questions around lobbying. The minister said he never met with Pilothouse. Did he ever meet with anyone from Omnitrax itself?

Hon. G. Collins (Minister of Finance): Yes. I have met with Pat Broe prior to the B.C. Rail transaction process starting. I met with him once after the B.C. Rail transaction had completed.

J. MacPhail: Boy, I’m sure glad I get the questions right. Is the minister aware of any of his staff that met with Omnitrax on his behalf?

Hon. G. Collins: I’m not aware of that, whether it would have happened or not — certainly not on my behalf. I wouldn’t have directed anybody to do that.

J. MacPhail: And Pat Broe is whom?

Hon. G. Collins: He’s the owner, president and CEO, I think, of Broe Companies, of which Omnitrax is a subsidiary.

J. MacPhail: What were the two meetings about?

Hon. G. Collins: The first meeting was, “Hi, this is who I am,” on his part. “I’d like to come and invest in British Columbia. I think what you guys are doing makes sense. It looks like a great place for me to invest. I’m interested in all sorts of things.” Just a general get-to-know-you type of meeting. I have those regularly with potential investors in British Columbia, if they want to come and talk. It’s more of a welcome, get-to-know-you, individual meeting.

After the transaction had closed, Mr. Broe wanted to tell us that despite not winning the B.C. Rail contract,, he would be interested in continuing to be part of British Columbia, if he could — similar to the prior meeting.

J. MacPhail: Was Mr. Basi present at either of those meetings?

Hon. G. Collins: No.

J. MacPhail: Who staffed the minister?

Hon. G. Collins: I rarely take staff with me. I think it’s a waste of their time for the most part when I travel or when I meet with them. Sometimes I do; sometimes I don’t. It depends on what the need is. I had a dinner, and I didn’t feel I needed staff at a dinner.

J. MacPhail: Was the minister aware that Omnitrax was bidding on the B.C. Rail spur line to Roberts Bank during that period of time?

Hon. G. Collins: No, I wasn’t. I knew they were generally looking to do investments in British Columbia. We certainly didn’t talk in any great detail about any of their proposals. Rather, it was a general discussion of things they might do in British Columbia. They were still interested in British Columbia. They were disappointed, obviously, that they weren’t the successful bidder on CN, but they wanted to continue to have a presence in British Columbia. They were looking for things they might do.

There are a whole range of things they might do. I hope at some point that they are part of that.

http://bctrialofbasi-virk.blogspot.com/2009/07/give-me-land-lots-of-land-under-starry.html

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC Canadian Funding Corp CEO

The Canadian Tourism Industry Benchmark Study: Where Do We Rank in the Context of the Canadian Economy? shows how the total tourism industry measures up. Using the most recent available data from 2007, the report reveals Canada’s tourism sector is performing favourably compared to other broad sectors of the economy. It ranked fourth in a composite analysis, behind: finance, insurance and real estate; wholesale and retail trade; and community, business and personal services.

It’s a strong and consistent performance over a broad range of economic and financial performance measures juxtaposed with other major economic sectors. The results suggest the tourism industry is certainly worthy of future investment considerations.

Meanwhile, the primary industries sector (agriculture, fishing and trapping, and forestry), which, like tourism represents 2% of Canada’s Gross Domestic Product, was the weakest performer in the report’s index.

The CTC commissioned The Conference Board of Canada to provide this benchmarking study on the vibrancy and competitiveness of the Canadian tourism industry.

http://www.adventuretravelnews.com/?p=472

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC Canadian Funding Corp CEO

RBC Economics says home affordability recorded some of the biggest quarterly improvements on record in the first quarter. Senior economist Robert Hogue says with market turmoil decreasing and credit flows increasing, resale activity has “rallied impressively.”

He says what is most impressive is how widespread this rebound has been, “with all major cities in Canada experiencing a revival.”

Declining costs of home ownership during the last year were driven by significant cuts in mortgage rates.

In the first quarter, says RBC, monthly payments on a typical detached bungalow fell by close to 17 per cent from a year earlier.

RBC says the proportion of pre-tax household income needed to own a home improved across all housing segments.

It says the benchmark detached bungalow moved to 39.4 per cent, the standard townhouse to 31.9 per cent, the standard condo to 27.1 per cent and the standard two-storey home to 44.7 per cent respectively.

RBC’s affordability measure for detached bungalows in the largest cities were 62.6 per cent in Vancouver, 45.9 per cent in Toronto, 39.1 per cent in Ottawa, 36.5 per cent in Montreal and 35.1 pr cent in Calgary.

“Housing markets generally appear to be on the mend in Canada but the road to full recovery still has obstacles,” added Hogue.

He added that further improvement in affordability will depend on greater gains in family income.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5iE0WgUzhh7xwb3MGbU8RjqZkWe_A

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, Canadian Funding Corp CEO

“Declining costs of home ownership during the last year were driven by significant cuts in mortgage rates along with the federal government taking an active role in supporting the mortgage securities market,” RBC said. “In the first quarter, monthly payments on a typical detached bungalow in Canada had decreased by close to 17 per cent from a year earlier.”

The average cost to own a bungalow in this year’s first quarter was $1,350 a month, down from $1,520 in 2008’s fourth quarter and $1,620 in last year’s first quarter.

RBC’s affordability index — the percentage of pre-tax monthly household income needed to maintain a home, including mortgage payments, utilities and property taxes — improved across all housing segments in Canada.

The average affordability for a bungalow in the first quarter was 39.4 per cent, down four points from 2008’s fourth quarter. It was 44.7 per cent for a standard two-storey (down five points), and 27.1 per cent for a condominium (down 2.8 points).

The average cost of maintaining a detached bungalow in Vancouver was 62.6 per cent of household income during the first quarter, while in Toronto it was 45.9 per cent, RBC said. Ottawa affordability was 39.1 per cent, Montreal 36.5 per cent, Calgary 35.1 per cent, and Edmonton 34 per cent.

From a provincial standpoint, RBC said housing affordability in British Columbia saw its biggest improvements since 1991, with the percentage of income required for various housing types dropping between 3.4 and 7.4 percentage points during the quarter. In Ontario, RBC said housing sales activity has returned to levels seen in mid-2008, largely as a result of improved affordability.

“With the turmoil in financial markets partially subsiding and the flow of credit increasing, home resale activity has rallied impressively since the late winter,” said Robert Hogue, RBC’s senior economist. “What’s most impressive is how widespread this rebound has been, with all major cities in Canada experiencing a revival.

“”With property values stabilizing and the effect of the steep drop in mortgage rates likely behind us, further improvement in affordability will depend on greater gains in family income,” Hogue added. “Those gains will be dictated by the speed of the economic recovery expected during the second half of this year.”

The RBC’s assessment follows a separate report this week from real estate agency Royal LePage that said improved housing-market conditions in this year’s second quarter points to a better overall performance in 2009 than previously anticipated.

Also, a number of local markets saw sharp spikes in sales last month, including Toronto, Ottawa and Edmonton, where new sales records were set for June.

Percentage of gross income required to own a standard bungalow in first quarter of 2009 (change from previous quarter):

British Columbia 59.0 (-6.0)

Alberta 33.2 (-4.6)

Saskatchewan 42.0 (-3.3)

Manitoba 35.3 (-2.9)

Ontario 38.6 (-4.2)

Quebec 32.3 (-2.5)

Atlantic 31.3 (-2.9)

Canada 39.4 (-4.0)

Source: RBC Economics

http://www.canada.com/Business/Home+ownership+getting+more+affordable/1771375/story.html

brought by Moishe Alexaneder, CFC Canadian Funding Corp CEO

and do i have to purchase a house that i didnt agree to buy?  my seller had only pictures of models.they show distinct difference between right side of duplex and left side. they put it up backwards.the pictures at the sales office apparently are different that those at the corporate office.what are my options?, more

and real estate and over due rent situation?  i’m being evicted because i’m 7 weeks behind in rent, can i make an agreement with the agent to pay off the debt over time and avoid going to court?
i mean after i leave…., more

I’m interested in starting a property clean-out service debri ect.. where can I start or call to get good lead?  , more

and how much notice does a landlord have to give you before eviction?

The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV) reports that sales of detached, attached and apartment properties increased 75.6 per cent in June 2009 to 4,259, from the 2,425 sales recorded in June 2008. The figure is just short of the record-breaking 4,333 sales which occurred in June 2005.

New listings for detached, attached and apartment properties declined 17.9 per cent to 5,372 in June 2009 compared to June 2008, when 6,546 new units were listed. However, new listings increased 13.5 per cent from May to June of this year. Total active listings in Greater Vancouver currently sit at 13,252, down 27 per cent from June 2008 and 2.9 per cent below the active listings count at the end of May 2009.

“Price reductions and low interest rates have created an improvement in affordability, which is causing the number of sales to rise to levels comparable to 2003 to 2007,” Scott Russell, REBGV president said.

“Many people who were reluctant to purchase a home last fall and earlier this year are returning to the market because they see conditions that appeal to their personal and financial needs,” Russell said. “However, the current marketplace is such that buyers are more inclined to walk if they don’t like the terms of an offer.”

Residential benchmark prices, as calculated by the MLSLink® Housing Price Index, declined 8.2 per cent to $518,855 in June 2009 compared to June 2008.

The number of sales of detached properties increased 81.6 per cent to 1,667 from the 918 detached sales recorded during the same period in 2008. The benchmark price for detached properties declined 8.4 per cent to $701,384 in June 2009 compared to June 2008.

The number of sales of apartment properties in June 2009 increased 69.3 per cent to 1,790, compared to 1,057 sales in June 2008. The benchmark price of an apartment property declined 8.2 per cent from June 2008 to $356,880.

The number of attached property sales in June 2009 increased 78.2 per cent to 802, compared with the 450 sales in June 2008. The benchmark price of an attached unit declined 7.3 per cent between June 2009 and 2008 to $441,620.

Bright spots in Greater Vancouver in June 2009 compared to June 2008:

Detached:

Burnaby up 109.7 per cent (151 units sold from 72)

Coquitlam up 122.2 per cent (160 units sold from 72)

Delta – South up 107.7 per cent (56 units sold from 27)

Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows up 54.3 per cent (162 units sold from 105)

New Westminster up 104.8 per cent (43 units sold from 21)

North Vancouver up 96.2 per cent (153 units sold from 78)

Port Moody/ Belcarra up 120 per cent (33 units sold from 15)

Richmond up 77.4 per cent (204 units sold from 115)

Squamish up 107.7 per cent (27 units sold from 13)

Sunshine Coast up 33.9 per cent (75 units sold from 56)

Vancouver East up 71.2 per cent (238 units sold from 139)

Vancouver West up 85.2 per cent (200 units sold from 108)

West Vancouver/Howe Sound up 117.8 per cent (98 units sold from 45)

Attached:

Burnaby up 81.8 per cent (140 units sold from 77)

Coquitlam up 80 per cent (54 units sold from 30)

Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows up 48.6 per cent (55 units sold from 37)

North Vancouver up 121.2 per cent (73 units sold from 33)

Port Coquitlam up 82.6 per cent (42 units sold from 23)

Port Moody/ Belcarra up 77.3 per cent (39 units sold from 22)

Richmond up 84.5 per cent (155 units sold from 84)

Vancouver East up 118.5 per cent (59 units sold from 27)

Vancouver West up 121.8 per cent (122 units sold from 55)

Apartments:

Burnaby up 60.4 per cent (239 units sold from 149)

Coquitlam up 93.9 per cent (95 units sold from 49)

New Westminster up 57.1 per cent (121 units sold from 77)

North Vancouver up 71.4 per cent (120 units sold from 70)

Port Coquitlam up 58.1 per cent (49 units sold from 31)

Port Moody/Belcarra up 128.6 per cent (48 units sold from 21)

Richmond up 54.1 per cent (225 units sold from 146)

Vancouver East up 58.7 per cent (165 units sold from 104)

Vancouver West up 87.2 per cent (627 units sold from 335)

West Vancouver/Howe Sound up 155.6 per cent (23 units sold from 9)

http://vancouverspaces.com/07/real-estate-board-june/

brought by Moishe Alexander, CFC CEO

The Worx Building was formerly the Monarch Building, a six-storey warehouse designed by Toronto architect C.H. Gibson in 1915. A good example of early 20th century industrial design, the building is constructed with load-bearing brick on a steel frame with timber purlins. The building is listed by Heritage Toronto as having architectural merit as it is an example of the characteristic materials, fenestration and classical organization and detailing of an early 20th century commercial warehouse.

Notable details, remarks Canadian Funding Corp, include marble floor tile and wall panels in the lobby and cut stone detailing at the main entry, sills and parapet. The existing exterior masonry wall (14″-27″) was exposed on the interior with no additional insulation. The old masonry construction was not airtight and the interior brick walls were found to include voids and rubble fill.

Previous uses of the building included light manufacturing, warehousing, clothing production, printing and design studios. The building occupancy rate gradually declined until, by 1996, only two floors were partially leased.

The developers’ goal was to provide innovative live-work one or two storey units ranging from 91 m2 to 167 m2 (980 ft.2 to 1,800 ft.2) this area close to the downtown core, the restaurant district, the Skydome and highway while offering a variety of unit designs within a historic building. The site was chosen for the historic aspect of the building, the potential for gated, surface parking, and its location on a street planted with mature trees and close to two parks, with limited through traffic.

The project was undertaken in 1997 after the King/Spadina Official Plan was put into place. The plan exempted this building conversion from density and coverage restrictions, and as a heritage building, it was exempt from parking requirements as well. A Heritage Easement Agreement gives additional development rights for long-term preservation of listed or designated structures. In this conversion, the construction of a new mezzanine structure on the roof was thus permitted. To satisfy municipal requirements, street improvements were necessary, including barrier-free access to the lowest building level, new landscaping, pedestrian-scale lighting, bicycle stands and new sidewalks with decorative stone trim.

There was no social housing mandate, funding or incentives for this site. Rent controls, high interest and property taxes limited private investment, but the City of Toronto’s “housing first” policy encouraged conversions. The main sustainable target was the preservation of the existing fabric, including the salvage of materials for reuse on site. Demolition of elevator shafts and new openings in exterior walls provided original bricks for reuse in filling openings of exposed interior wythes. New brick was matched for size to achieve consistent coursing-an exact match of colours was not found.

The initial design of the building mechanical system was based on individual, air- exchange heat pumps located at the exterior wall of each unit, but existing masonry spandrels and windowsills did not allow for this type of system. In the end, combination domestic hot water and individually metered space-heating boilers were leased by residents from the gas utility. Cooling capacity was provided by an air-cooled, liquid chiller installed on the open upper level of a service building located at grade. Common area HVAC systems introduced ventilation to entrance lobbies and corridors. Direct air leakage at window and door frames was addressed by the use of expanding foam sealants.

Acoustic measures for floors and demising walls were identified as an important concern to purchasers. The existing wood beams and decks were retained as a design feature, exposed to view from below as the ceiling of each unit. As a result, acoustic treatments could only be applied to the upper surface of the floor. Sheathing, acoustic underlay, polyethylene film and poured lightweight concrete were applied for acoustic insulation from floor to floor.

The typical demising wall includes two layers of 5/8″ gypsum wallboard on each side of the studs with 1/2″ resilient channels and 21/2″ acoustic batt insulation. The design rating of the assembly is STC 55. The acoustic consultant retained by the developer recommended this assembly, which exceeds OBC minimum requirements, in order to address acoustic issues identified by many purchasers in conversion projects. Brick masonry walls and timber decks are not monolithic, and will provide sound transmission paths that are difficult to seal if these materials remain exposed. An increased STC rating for demising walls does compensate to some extent for the flanking transmission that can be expected. The total thickness (mass) of gypsum wallboard panels was relied on to reduce acoustic transmission rather than varying the thickness of the panels.

Other measures undertaken to address acoustic transmission at partition edges include installation of compressed batt insulation at studs abutting the exterior masonry walls, as well as 7/16″, rigid fibreglass insulation at top tracks abutting the underside of the wood deck and at bottom tracks installed on a poured concrete topping. Fasteners for the perimeter studs and tracks were provided with steel and rubber washers to acoustically isolate the wall and floor assemblies.

Acoustic sealant was used to seal the perimeter of the interior layer of gypsum wallboard to the adjacent floor, wall and ceiling surfaces, and joint filler was used at the exterior layer to permit application of paint finishes.

Sales have indicated a strong demand for residential conversions that offer unconventional unit plans, have a historic character, provide parking, and are located close to the downtown core. The turnover rate has been approximately 10 per cent per year, and sale prices have increased at an annual rate ranging from 15 to 20 per cent. Purchasers could modify layouts and upgrade finishes and fixtures. A presentation centre and models were built to exhibit the upgrade options. Custom upgrades, as well as standard upgrades, were available. Thirty-three of thirty- four unit buyers chose upgrade options. In retrospect, the architect thought that the incorporation of purchaser revisions and upgrades was an enriching addition to the project.

Acknowldegments to CMHC.

fmbgqitdez