<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Funding Corp. Reviews CMHC Case Studies&#187; way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/tag/way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com</link>
	<description>CMHC Case Study Reviews by the Canadian Funding Corp.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:25:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Improved affordability helps spur housing market, says RBC Economics</title>
		<link>http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/2009/07/improved-affordability-helps-spur-housing-market-says-rbc-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/2009/07/improved-affordability-helps-spur-housing-market-says-rbc-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Building Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuse Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bungalow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Funding Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moishe Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTTAWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Hogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Softening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Softening home prices drew Canadians back into the housing market in a big way in the first quarter, according to a Royal Bank (TSX:RY) report.
RBC Economics says home affordability recorded some of the biggest quarterly improvements on record in the first quarter. Senior economist Robert Hogue says with market turmoil decreasing and credit flows increasing, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Softening home prices drew Canadians back into the housing market in a big way in the first quarter, according to a Royal Bank (TSX:RY) report.</p>
<p>RBC Economics says home affordability recorded some of the biggest quarterly improvements on record in the first quarter. Senior economist Robert Hogue says with market turmoil decreasing and credit flows increasing, resale activity has &#8220;rallied impressively.&#8221;</p>
<p>He says what is most impressive is how widespread this rebound has been, &#8220;with all major cities in Canada experiencing a revival.&#8221;</p>
<p>Declining costs of home ownership during the last year were driven by significant cuts in mortgage rates.</p>
<p>In the first quarter, says RBC, monthly payments on a typical detached bungalow fell by close to 17 per cent from a year earlier.</p>
<p>RBC says the proportion of pre-tax household income needed to own a home improved across all housing segments.</p>
<p>It says the benchmark detached bungalow moved to 39.4 per cent, the standard townhouse to 31.9 per cent, the standard condo to 27.1 per cent and the standard two-storey home to 44.7 per cent respectively.</p>
<p>RBC&#8217;s affordability measure for detached bungalows in the largest cities were 62.6 per cent in Vancouver, 45.9 per cent in Toronto, 39.1 per cent in Ottawa, 36.5 per cent in Montreal and 35.1 pr cent in Calgary.</p>
<p>&#8220;Housing markets generally appear to be on the mend in Canada but the road to full recovery still has obstacles,&#8221; added Hogue.</p>
<p>He added that further improvement in affordability will depend on greater gains in family income.</p>
<p>http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5iE0WgUzhh7xwb3MGbU8RjqZkWe_A</p>
<p>reviewed by Moishe Alexander, Canadian Funding Corp  CEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/2009/07/improved-affordability-helps-spur-housing-market-says-rbc-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moishe Alexander reports : Buildings 2.0</title>
		<link>http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/2009/06/moishe-alexander-reports-buildings-20/</link>
		<comments>http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/2009/06/moishe-alexander-reports-buildings-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco Connected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moishe Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Buildings 2.0 is a vision that  	intricately intertwines buildings with Internet technologies. It is a vision  	that the future of buildings is one which is controlled, managed and  	connected to the Internet, in a way that goes far beyond simply placing a  	web server to the control system or in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="65%">
<p align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Buildings 2.0 is a vision that  	intricately intertwines buildings with Internet technologies. It is a vision  	that the future of buildings is one which is controlled, managed and  	connected to the Internet, in a way that goes far beyond simply placing a  	web server to the control system or in the use of IP.</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="35%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;"><span style="font-size: large;">A</span> great deal is being said  about the future of buildings. How information technology is shaping how  buildings are designed, built, operated, and how buildings are generally viewed  in the Internet-centric world we live in today. Many words and descriptions have  been used to describe this vision, but none have come closer than the outcome of  the Cisco Connected Roundtable at BuilConn in Dubai on the 28th February 2007.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">The concept is to frame the future of buildings under  the term “Buildings 2.0”.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;"><strong>What is Buildings 2.0?</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 is a vision that intricately  intertwines buildings with Internet technologies. It is a vision that the future  of buildings is one which is controlled, managed and connected to the Internet,  in a way that goes far beyond simply  placing a web server to the control system or in the use of IP.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 is a vision of how technologies such as  IP and Web Services will transform how building systems connect with each other,  how the limitations of traditional integration is blown away.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 is a desire to focus how we look at  buildings in a new way, how the experience of the occupier (through new-found  services)&#8211;in concert with the purpose of the building&#8211;and maximizing a  building’s performance can work in harmony.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 is also an initiative that is sensitive  to the realities of the immense investment building owners have in their  buildings, and must present a way for facility managers to leverage existing  systems and assets to work in the context of the vision outlined by Buildings  2.0.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 must be an initiative that cares for  the scarce resources we have on planet Earth. Enormous opportunities exist today  to adopt technologies that will enable buildings to use less or even no  fossil-based energy, and thus to produce less harmful carbon emissions.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;"><strong>An Industry Initiative</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 needs to be a broad industry  initiative, not owned by any one element, but driven for all, and by all who  subscribe to the principles outlined in a continuous discussion on how buildings  need to change in the face of the enormous opportunities enabled by the Internet  revolution.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 will present to building owners,  developers and operators a new and alternative value proposition, an alternative  view to the traditional ways that we have all looked at buildings in the past.  The Buildings 2.0 proposition goes beyond looking at buildings simply as a box  to house people or things, but an active component of real-time enterprises that  makes the world what it is today.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 will define a new way to design  buildings, from the strategic thought process for the need for space, through to  the architectural and mechanical/electrical designs that occur before buildings  are constructed. A recognition that the design only represents a small part of  the life of a building, which if done right can make the building flexible and  valuable for decades of productive use.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 will also define the manner that we  build buildings, specifically how we include the myriad of disciplines involved  with buildings into a well-woven integrated partnership ensuring an on-time,  on-budget delivery of the vision of the owner or developer.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">More info from <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Anto Budiardjo<br />
President &amp; CEO,<br />
<a href="http://www.clasma.com/">Clasma Events Inc.</a></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">
<p><object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9y5SV3P6duU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9y5SV3P6duU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="340" height="285"></embed></object></p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;"><strong>Technology Neutral</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 must be fundamentally technology  neutral, recognizing that almost all of the technologies in use today have only  existed for a fraction of the time that most buildings today have remained  standing.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong> </strong></span>Buildings 2.0 must recognize that flexible standards must be adopted to make  technology work. Adopted technologies must be truly open, be uncontrolled by any  single entity, and unnumbered by any unreasonable economic constraints for its  use.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 must recognize that information is the  true currency of technology.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 will need to focus on information  models that cover the broadest perspectives of buildings from design to  operation, information models that must easily enable interoperability between  the seemingly disparate stakeholders who have interests in buildings.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 will outline a broad and  all-encompassing reference design and architecture of how the complex components  of design, construction and operation processes can work together in a manner  that is flexible and valuable to all stakeholders involved.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 must recognize security and regulatory  constraints as well as issues such as privacy and safety.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;"><strong>Making Buildings 2.0 a reality</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">In many ways, Buildings 2.0 is with us today, in  technology terms. In many ways the ball-and-chain that has held the industry  back to traditional ways remains strong today, barriers that would inhibit the  realization of Buildings 2.0’s vision. It is only with a common vision that this  ball-and-chain can be broken.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">An invitation is hereby communicated to all involved  with buildings to embrace the principles of Buildings 2.0, to help develop it,  help to adopt and implement it, and make it the only way we should be looking at  buildings.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Buildings 2.0 must engender a continuous improvement  and questioning if we are doing enough to make our built environment the best  that it can be for society at large.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">The author recognizes that this is only a start of  what Buildings 2.0 is. It is a concept that needs further discussion, evolution  and questioning. There is no ownership in this document, only a desire to  further how we design, build and operate buildings.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">Those who support Buildings 2.0 must define tangible  tools for Buildings 2.0 to evolve, including tools that enable this vision to be  understood by a broad spectrum of stakeholders including laymen; such as  illustrating key differences in technologies and benefits between Buildings 2.0  and previous views of buildings.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">The reality of Buildings 2.0 is that it must enable  commerce to develop, for without commerce, without positive economic impact to  all stakeholders, Buildings 2.0 will not become a reality. The Internet has  shown us how the power of the network can bring about untold opportunities. It’s  time to discover them in the context of buildings.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 15px;">After all, who wants to buy or use a version 1.0 of  anything these days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canadian-funding-corp-case-studies.com/2009/06/moishe-alexander-reports-buildings-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
